|
SLIDES
& TRANSCRIPTS
Friday,
December 13, 2002
Lymph
Node Density as a Prognostic Marker
John
Stein, M.D.
|
| Slide
1: |
Radical
cystectomy is the gold standard of therapy for high-grade invasive
bladder cancer.
TOP
|
| Slide
2: |
|
We
have previously reported our experience in over 1,000 patients undergoing
radical cystectomy. Now, despite an early and aggressive approach
for bladder cancer,
TOP
|
| Slide
3: |
|
24
percent of our patients have lymph node-positive disease at the
time cystectomy. These patients are clearly at high risk for tumor
recurrence, specifically when we compare them to other pathologic
subgroups.
TOP
|
| Slide
4: |
|
Now,
risk factors for patients with known positive disease, as we reported,
includes the p-stage of the primary bladder tumor,
TOP
|
| Slide
5: |
|
as
well as the tumor burden, or the number of lymph node involved with
tumor.
TOP
|
| Slide
6: |
|
There
is a growing body of evidence that also suggests that the extent
of lymphadenectomy is critical patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
There are three reports in the literature, and Harry elegantly gave
us a fourth report this morning looking at this.
TOP
|
| Slide
7: |
|
The Memorial group did show that of patients undergoing a radical
cystectomy that had no lymph node disease, if you removed eight
lymph nodes or more, you had a significantly higher proportion of
survival, compared to those patients what had less than eight lymph
nodes removed.
TOP
|
| Slide
8: |
|
Similarly,
Poulsen and Ken Stevens in Copenhagen compared their extended lymph
node resection in patients with organ-confined bladder cancer to
a more limited lymph node resection.
As you can see
here, those patients that have an extended lymph node dissection
did significantly better. In the extended lymph node dissection
group they had an average of 25 lymph nodes removed, compared to
only 14 lymph nodes removed in the limited pelvic lymphadenectomy.
TOP
|
| Slide
9: |
|
Lastly,
Leissner et al. also looked at their patients undergoing radical
cystectomy without evidence of lymph node metastasis, and found
that if you removed greater than 15 lymph nodes, you have a significantly
higher recurrence-free survival.
TOP
|
| Slide
10: |
|
Now,
I would like to present the concept of lymph node density. Lymph
node density, by definition, is the number of lymph nodes involved
with tumor, divided by the number of lymph nodes removed. Therefore,
lymph node density incorporates two prognostic factors simultaneously.
That is, the lymph node tumor burden or the number of involved lymph
nodes, divided by the extent of lymph node dissection, or the number
of lymph nodes removed.
TOP
|
| Slide
11: |
|
So
we evaluated our clinical outcomes and risk factors for patients
with lymph node metastasis following radical cystectomy. And we
also evaluated this concept of lymph node density.
TOP
|
| Slide
12: |
|
From
July 1971 through December 1997, of the 1,054 patients, again, 244
or 24 percent had known positive disease, and this is the focus
of the analysis. The median age was 66 years. We had good follow-up
of over 10 years in this group.
TOP
|
| Slide
13: |
|
Now,
the lymph node dissection has been standard in our group, and this
extends approximately 2 centimeters above the aortic bifurcation.
It extends laterally to the genitofemoral nerve, distally to the
lymph node of Cloquet, or the circumflex iliac vein laterally, and
it should include all the obturator, as well as the presacral, and
the presciatic lymph nodes.
TOP
|
| Slide
14: |
|
Now, adjuvant therapies are clearly an important component to the
comprehensive treatment of bladder cancer, and have clearly evolved
as well over the past 25 years. In our patients, over 50 percent
with node positive disease did receive chemotherapy, primarily in
an adjuvant fashion.
TOP
|
| Slide
15: |
|
When
you look at the number of lymph nodes removed in this node-positive
group, the median number of lymph nodes removed is 30. The median
number of lymph nodes involved with tumor is two. You can also see
that 86 percent of our patients had more than 15 lymph nodes removed.
TOP
|
| Slide
16: |
|
We had two peri-operative deaths and 66 early complications. This
does not significantly differ from most patients with organ-confined
or extravesicle lymph node-negative disease. We had no direct complications
related to the topical lymphadenectomy, however, when you look in
the literature, the incidence of lymphoceles and lymphedema may
range in 1-3 percent.
TOP
|
|
Slide 17: |
|
We
analyzed the presence of carcinoma in situ for the primary pathologic
subgroups, the number of lymph nodes removed, the number of lymph
nodes involved, as well as lymph node density --
TOP
|
| Slide
18: |
|
and
again, by definition is the number of positive lymph nodes divided
by the number of lymph nodes removed.
TOP
|
| Slide
19: |
|
When
you look at the overall recurrence-free survival for those patients,
you can see that for the first three years the recurrence-free in
overall survival curves are basically super imposable. This suggests
that the vast majority of deaths during this first three years are
related to bladder cancer. Following this, the recurrence curves
level off, and you can see most patients die of associated co-morbidity.
TOP
|
| Slide
20: |
When you look at the presence of carcinoma in situ in lymph node-positive
disease, you can see that there is no effective carcinoma in situ
in lymph node-positive patients.
TOP
|
| Slide
21: |
|
When
you look at the total number of lymph nodes removed, if you had
greater than 15 lymph nodes removed, you had a slightly improved
recurrence-free survival compared to those with less than 15 lymph
nodes removed, but this was statistically significant.
TOP
|
| Slide
22: |
|
When
you have an organ-confined lymph node-positive patient, they have
a higher recurrence-free survival compared to those with extravesicle
and lymph node-positive disease.
TOP
|
| Slide
23: |
|
Tumor
burden was also significant. If you had less than or equal to eight
lymph nodes that were involved with tumor, you had a significantly
improved recurrence-free survival compared to those with greater
tumor burden, and this is significant.
TOP
|
| Slide
24: |
|
Lymph node density -- if you have a lymph node density of less than
or equal to 20 percent, you have a significant improved recurrence-free
survival compared to those with a lymph node density greater than
20 percent.
TOP
|
| Slide
25: |
|
Now, notwithstanding the limitations of an adjuvant or a prospective
trial, and clearly biases, we did look at adjuvant chemotherapy
in our group of patients. Those patients that did receive chemotherapy
had a significantly improved recurrence-free survival.
TOP
|
| Slide
26: |
|
In
a univariant analysis, we are looking at the various prognostic
factors. Age, gender, urinary diversion, and the number of lymph
nodes removed were not statistically significant.
TOP
|
| Slide
27: |
|
However,
those patients that received adjuvant chemotherapy, the pathologic
subgroup, the lymph node density, and the lymph nodes removed were
all significant in a univariate analysis.
TOP
|
| Slide
28: |
|
When
you look at a multivariable analysis of these same factors, the
same factors including pathologic subgroup, adjuvant chemotherapy,
lymph node density, and lymph nodes involved are all independent
prognostic variables.
TOP
|
| Slide
29: |
|
A lymphadenectomy is a critical component to the treatment of patients
with bladder cancer. It does allow for a safe anatomical dissection.
It does provide pathologic staging. And it may have some therapeutic
benefits. But right now, we clearly do not know the absolute limits
of the dissection.
TOP
|
| Slide
30: |
|
In our group, the independent prognostic variables remain pathologic
subgroup, the administration of chemotherapy, the number of lymph
nodes involved, as well as lymph node density.
TOP
|
| Slide
31: |
|
I
believe a lymph node dissection is important in the treatment of
patients with bladder cancer. We do report long-term survival in
about a third of our patients with lymph node-positive disease.
We're starting to develop some idea of the prognostic variables
in this high-risk group of patients.
TOP
|
| Slide
32: |
|
I
think lymph node density is an important prognostic variable as
it simultaneously relates to the lymph node tumor burden, as well
as the number of lymph nodes removed.
I think future
clinical trials, staging systems, and also other disease systems
such as testes cancer, possibly renal cell carcinoma, and even prostate
cancer may consider applying some of these prognostic variables.
Thank you very
much.
TOP
|