





 


|
|
| SLIDES
& TRANSCRIPTS
Friday,
December 13, 2002
Special
Address
Seamless
Urologic Oncology: Mapping the Future
Andrew
von Eschenbach, M.D.
Director, National Cancer Institute
|
| Slide
1: |
Thanks,
Marston.
You know,
it has been eleven months since this has been my new home. And
I happen to have had the opportunity to be up here a number of
times already. But I don't think I've ever felt as much at home
as I do right now, looking out at the audience, and seeing so
many, many dear and great friends.
I want you
to know it's a special moment for me to be able to share with
you, the vision and hope that I think we all have for the progress
that we are able to make in oncology, and especially be able to
focus my remarks on what I have always believed, and that is that
at the forefront of that progress in oncology, urologic oncology
is in fact our greatest hope with regard to leadership, and with
regard to progress.
So what I
would like to do over these next few minutes is to share with
you a little bit of that vision, if you will, and to kind of put
in perspective what I see as our National Cancer Institute agenda,
but particularly how that in fact is so incredibly dependent upon
the success of the effort that you all are involved in.
TOP
|
| Slide
2: |
|
Many
of you have heard me at different venues speak about the future
of oncology, and the belief that I have that we are at a very, very
special moment in time. That at the turn of this 21st century, we
actually have within our grasp, the ability to fundamentally change
the paradigm of oncology from what we have been used to in the past,
namely seek and destroy, to what is the great hope for the future,
namely target and control.
And the basis
for that belief is because of the tremendous progress that has been
made in biomedical research. And the human genome project is just
one example of the major breakthroughs and opportunities; that for
the first time, are now enabling us to have the tools to unravel
the secrets and the mystery of this disease that we have been struggling
with.
TOP |
| Slide
3: |
|
We
now recognize that the cancer program is in fact extraordinarily
complex. But there are unique and specific processes that are associated
with the cancer problem. And that in fact, when one thinks about
urologic cancers, and one thinks about the portfolio of biologic
diversity that exists with regard to prostate cancer, bladder cancer,
renal cell carcinoma, and testicular cancer, the entire portfolio
of the complexity of oncology is really encompassed by the diseases
that we are in fact as a specialty, involved in understanding and
treating.
And so when
we think about the complexity of cancer, there is probably no other
segment in oncology that is better equipped than urologic oncology,
to really begin to dissect out the specific elements of the problem.
And in that context, then be able to arrive at particularly significant
opportunities and interventions.
TOP |
| Slide
4: |
|
The
way in which I believe we need to accomplish this new paradigm and
seize this new opportunity is to begin to think about the problem
with regard to the investigation of its individual components. And
the National Cancer Institute's agenda will be very much to continue
to enhance our investigation of the fundamental mechanisms that
are operative with regard to the development of the cancer cell.
But also importantly,
to realize that that cancer cell and its ultimate behavior are determined
by the interaction that it has with both its micro and its macro
environment.
And so, understanding
cancer not only at the level of the cancer cell, but understanding
it with regard to the level of the host and host-tumor interactions,
and also beginning to understand the problem as it relates to populations
are going to be critically important ongoing initiatives. And most
importantly is to then take that perspective to a systems biology
approach, where we not only understand the individual elements,
but understand their dynamic interaction.
TOP |
| Slide
5: |
|
The
systems biology approach will need to be fostered again at the cellular
level, and many of you are at the forefront of understanding many
of the pathways and circuits that are operative within the cancer
cell. And our goal in going forward in the future is to not only
to continue to elucidate each of these important mechanisms, but
most importantly, to begin to see how they interrelate as systems,
and then in that context, be able to define appropriate interventions
that will in fact be able to alter and change the biologic behavior
that needs to be overcome.
TOP |
| Slide
6: |
|
The
other important agenda for us, and again, one in which I think urologic
cancer has the opportunity to be at the forefront of the development
of our new knowledge and understanding is to begin to appreciate
not only the changes that are occurring within the cancer cell,
but the dynamic interaction the cancer cell has with its environment.
And certainly
in this regard, prostate cancer, with regard to the cell-cell interactions
that have occurred between bone, as a unique site of metastasis,
and the prostate cancer cell are really unraveling for us, the basis
of an extremely important part of the portfolio with regard to our
ability to intervene in the malignant process.
An area that
is really tremendously understudied is our understanding of the
macro environment, and the importance of host factors. And again,
with regard to urologic cancer, we recognize the importance of hormones,
nutrition, and the immune status in this particular regard. And
these are going to be important areas of investigation for us.
TOP |
| Slide
7: |
|
In addition to laying out a portfolio that defines important strategic
scientific initiatives, I think it is extremely important to also
re-emphasize the lesson that we have learned over time within the
field of urologic oncology, and that is the need to even more effectively
integrate into a seamless approach, the dynamic interaction that
has to occur between clinical research, or clinical observations,
and basic laboratory investigations.
We recognize
that cancer really is a biologic phenomenon, and that in its clinical
manifestations, as well as in it basic mechanisms, we have an extraordinary
need for fundamental and primary understanding.
TOP |
| Slide
8: |
|
But
this understanding can stem from the examples of people like John
Grayhack, who have always emphasized for us the importance of observing
the manifestation of disease within the patient.
Clinicians and
clinical observations are as fundamentally important in this new
paradigm of discovery as are laboratory investigations. And we have
to think not of the continuum of bench to bedside, but a continuum
of patient to bench to patient. It is in a continuum that I think
we have the greatest opportunity.
TOP
|
| Slide
9: |
|
And
observations of clinical significance, for example, the observation
of unique predilection of various tumors for certain sites of metastasis
actually open for us, extraordinary opportunities for investigation.
In urologic
oncology, we have known for decades, the unique biologic manifestations
of osteoblastic metastasis and prostate cancer.
TOP |
| Slide
10: |
|
The
fact that clinical observation was telling us something extremely
important about the biologic manifestation of the disease, mainly
that there was a very unique interaction between prostate cancer
cells and bone cells, has now been able to be more fully appreciated,
because for the first time, we can take clinical observations like
that to the laboratory and begin to define their underlying mechanisms.
TOP |
| Slide
11: |
|
And
that mechanistic investigation has really led us to be able to refine
and in fact replace former hypotheses that explained the clinical
phenomenon.
When I began
my urologic oncology fellowship at MD Anderson with Bruce Bracken,
the explanation for the predilection of prostate cancer to spread
preferentially to the axial skeleton, and particularly the lumbar
spine and pelvis was because there was a passive dissemination through
Batson's plexus.
TOP |
| Slide
12: |
|
We
now know that that in fact is a phenomenon of clinical observation
that has extraordinarily profound biologic implications, because
at the mechanistic level, through work being done by Bernardo Pasqualini
and Wadi Arap, we are beginning to appreciate the fact that there
are specific ligand receptors in tumor cells that then result in
their specific adherence to endothelium within particular organs.
TOP |
| Slide
13: |
|
And
that the endothelium does in fact have unique organ specificity
that then results in the preferential spread of certain tumors like
prostate cancer, to certain sites like bone.
TOP |
| Slide
14: |
|
And that this is in fact an opportunity for us by virtue of understanding
these underlying mechanisms, to then begin to develop opportunities
to alter or change the cytokines responsible for these specific
biologic interactions. And that opens up for us, incredibly important
therapeutic opportunities.
TOP |
| Slide
15: |
|
So
our mechanistic investigations must then not stop there, but be
taken to the point where we can then develop biologic-based intervention.
And again, one
of the important agendas with regard to the National Cancer Institute
going forward is to be sure that we are in fact continuing this
paradigm of mechanistic investigations leading then to the development
of biologic-based interventions.
TOP |
| Slide
16: |
|
And one particular proof of principle of the fact that these biologic-based
interventions can in fact substantially alter the course of disease
in fact the proof of principle that has been made available to us
by interventions like Gleevec and herceptin, as mechanistic-based
interventions.
TOP
|
|
Slide 17: |
|
Well,
at that point, once the interventions are defined and developed,
we must deliver them back into the clinical arena, but do so in
a mechanism now of going forward in which we are able to monitor
not just simply clinical outcomes of survival or tumor regression,
but more importantly, we may be able to measure outcomes having
to do with our ability to impact on those fundamental mechanisms
that are responsible.
TOP |
| Slide
18: |
|
And
again, the NCI's commitment to continuing to develop the tools and
the infrastructure in genomics and proteomics that will allow us,
both from the point of view of molecular pathology, as well as from
the point of view of functional imaging, to be able to monitor and
determine in real time, the ability to alter or change mechanisms
becomes an extremely important part of our strategic agenda going
forward.
TOP |
| Slide
19: |
|
And
so I envision that we will see a continued essential requirement
of the close collaborative interaction between clinical scientists
and basic scientists, working together effectively as teams through
an agenda that not only defines what are appropriate and relevant
manifestations of disease, but what their underlying mechanisms
are at the biologic level, and then our ability to develop interventions
that truly change the course of the disease.
TOP |
| Slide
20: |
We are beginning to see this play out in only one example that
I have time to share with you, with regard to again the story
of prostate metastasis in which work that was begun initially
at MD Anderson with Leon Chung, in terms of understanding the
paracrine and autocrine factors that are responsible for the interaction
between prostate cancer cells in the bone stromal has opened up
a whole new set of opportunities for us with regard to altering
the bone environment.
TOP
|
| Slide
21: |
|
And
there are currently ongoing clinical trials that are directed at
being able to alter or change prostate cancer bone metastasis, not
by affecting the prostate cancer cell, but by directly altering
the bone micro-environment.
TOP |
| Slide
22: |
|
Similarly,
the work done by Bernardo Pasqualini and Wadi Arap in defining ligand-specific
receptors on the surface of tumor cells that were homing to endothelial
receptors at organ sites, much in the way zip codes get letters
to a particular mailbox, is opening up extraordinary opportunities
not only to alter or change the zip code to prevent the homing mechanism
from being operative, but even thinking of using the zip codes as
a way of homing target-specific therapy to sites of metastasis.
TOP |
| Slide
23: |
|
And
finally, using mechanistic-based interventions, recognizing for
example, the role of PDGF in prostate cancer in a bone metastasizing
model, demonstrating the ability to combine mechanistic-based interventions
in a way that with the combination, for example here, in this animal
model of STI571 and Taxol results in a significant alteration and
change in prostate cancer bone metastatic biology.
TOP |
| Slide
24: |
|
Urologic cancers are probably, of all of the diseases that we deal
with as a group, extraordinarily well positioned to really help
us amplify and expand this approach to the new paradigm. And there
are extraordinary opportunities within each of our tumor systems
for us to be able to exploit those fundamental mechanisms that I
shared with you on the very first slide that are responsible for
the malignant phenomenon.
TOP |
| Slide
25: |
|
And a few months ago at the White House in a ceremony to honor cancer
survivors, Pres. Bush reaffirmed his commitment to this opportunity
and to this agenda. And in the course of that commitment said, "For
the first time in human history we can say with certainty that the
war on cancer is winnable, and that this nation will not quit until
our victory is complete."
And the reason
he was able to make that statement is because of the kind of progress
that you in this audience, have been responsible for that has enabled
us to now begin to think about cancer in an entirely different way
than we have been able to in the past, because we are in fact for
the first time, really beginning to define those underlying biologic
mechanisms that now are amendable to strategic therapeutic interventions.
TOP |
| Slide
26: |
|
The
way we will begin to continue to promote and further enhance this
new paradigm with new hope is to break the process down into a strategy
of a portfolio of discovery, development, and delivery. And within
each of these portfolios, to begin to define the unique elements
that are relevant for the mechanisms of cancer.
To use that
information to develop interventions that will more effectively
detect, predict, treat, and prevent the disease, and then in the
context of an infrastructure, to be able to deliver that to patients
who are in need in a way that extracts the information in a real
time and relevant fashion.
TOP |
| Slide
27: |
|
There
are a variety of initiatives that we have underway, and I cannot
share obviously the entire strategic agenda for you, but I would
like to make a few important points about new directions that I
think we need to pursue.
Within the area
of discovery and our ability to drive the engine of research that
is evolving this new knowledge of our understanding of disease at
the level of the cancer cell, the person, and the population, there
are important strategic opportunities for us.
I think we have
the ability to enhance our creativity with regard to research. And
we are engaged in a pilot project with one of the other institutes
to look at funding mechanisms that are outside of the traditional
mechanisms that are currently being employed, that really will allow
for creativity and non-traditional thinking to be funded, and to
emerge.
We also have
to look at mechanisms that go beyond investigator-initiated research,
and the traditional RO1 mechanisms to look at the opportunities
to not only foster team science, but to recognize the contributions
that come from collaborative, interactive, scientific pursuits.
There are important
initiatives that we have underway to begin to embrace newer, emerging
technologies that up to this point in time have not been necessarily
central to biomedical research. And one example is an emerging investment
in developing nanotechnology.
And finally,
alternative disciplines that are really going to be critically important,
for example in terms of proteomics to move to in silico with regard
to strategies of computational biology.
There are a
host of initiatives with regard to development. We must effectively
accelerate the pipeline for drug development, and we have collaborative
activities underway with the FDA that will help us with a lot of
the regulatory issues, as well as public-private partnerships with
the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry that will enable us
to enhance the identification and validation of targets.
And once again,
the building of infrastructure around tissue banks and bioinformatics
that will enable the more effective and rapid development of interventions
based on our enhanced discovery of fundamental mechanisms.
And with regard
to delivery, the need to create platforms that will bring these
new interventions to the clinical arena, and do so in a context
in which we are extracting clinically important and relevant information
from a research perspective is another extremely important part
of the agenda going forward.
And the expansion
of our cancer centers and our SPORE programs, and the integration
of those programs is a process that is currently underway, as is
a very significant effort of looking at our opportunity to integrate
and enhance our clinical trials infrastructure throughout the entire
country.
In addition
to that, it is extremely important that we expand our infrastructure
of the workforce, both in terms of basic scientists, as well as
clinical scientists. And our training programs are getting a great
deal of attention with regard to mechanisms going forward in the
future, particularly around the development of translational scientists.
And obviously,
it's extremely important in the delivery agenda that we pay focused
attention to the problem of the disproportionate burden of cancer
among minorities.
TOP |
| Slide
28: |
|
Urologic
cancers have to be an important and critical part of this discovery,
development, and delivery portfolio. The prevalence of the diseases
that we deal with, the biologic diversity that they present, and
the very fact that we have so much opportunity, because of investigators
such as yourselves. We do in fact, within this field, have a critical
mass of investigators, multidisciplines, and the appropriate resources.
TOP
|
| Slide
29: |
|
We will continue to enhance the mechanisms that will enable all
of these elements to be applied in a research dimension that take
us from original thought, to the point where we actually have impacted
on someone's life in a positive and effective way.
TOP |
| Slide
30: |
|
We have made a commitment to enhancing the resources that are being
applied to urologic malignancies, and there has been a continued
increase in funding for kidney and bladder cancer. And obviously,
we have had the opportunity to substantially enhance the amount
of funding that has been directed towards prostate cancer. And urologic
malignancies are in fact a very significant part of our research
portfolio.
TOP |
| Slide
31: |
|
The
distribution of those funds is really across the entire continuum,
so that we are looking not only at the more fundamental, basic research
initiatives in biology, but making sure that we are really providing
a full continuum through cancer survivorship and survival.
And each of
the portfolios, beginning with prostate, may have a slightly different
mix with regard to their current content,
TOP |
| Slide
32: |
|
but
our intention is to maintain and create a balanced portfolio across
all of the initiatives that we have underway at this point.
TOP |
| Slide
33: |
|

TOP |
| Slide
34: |
|
The
SPORE programs have been continuously increasing, because of the
enormous success that they have had. And this is an area where GU
tumors have had a great opportunity.
TOP |
| Slide
35: |
|
When
the SPORE program was first introduced in the early nineties, there
were only two prostate SPOREs. We now have more prostate SPOREs
than any other single disease site as we go forward in our strategic
planning. And we are now at about a level where we are also beginning
to introduce GU SPOREs, the first one being focused primarily on
bladder.
One of the important
issues with regard to the SPOREs, and again where GU tumors have
to be at the forefront of leadership is that we are seeing integration
occur across the SPOREs in which prostate, especially around the
development of clinical trials, has been a leader in this area in
which the SPOREs are now interconnecting and collaborating with
each other in the development of programs that are applicable.
And in addition
to collaboration and coordination with regard to an organ site focus,
there is now beginning to develop, collaboration and cooperation
across the SPOREs in terms of various disciplines as they focus
on mechanisms that are particularly applicable across organ sites.
So one of the key elements of the SPORE program going forward will
not be just a simple expansion, but most importantly their enhanced
integration.
TOP |
| Slide
36: |
|
One very important initiative that GU tumors again has been at the
forefront is the ability to integrate the SPORE program with other
major initiatives that are underway with regard to basic investigation
or discovery. The mouse models of human cancer consortium, which
is an effort to develop models of human cancer in the mouse, for
the first time had a joint meeting with the prostate SPOREs just
about a month ago.
And in that
context, there was an extraordinary dynamic interaction between
the two that has resulted in over 50 recommendations going forward
for the opportunities for increased collaboration and resource sharing.
So it's a part of our agenda to drive the integration of these programs.
TOP
|
| Slide
37: |
|
You
have already heard about our process of progress review groups that
are developed to be able to focus and define an appropriate strategic
portfolio going forward. And the program review groups have really
been quite effective at being able to define for us the strategic
agenda going forward in prostate cancer, as well as in kidney and
bladder cancer.
TOP
|
| Slide
38: |
|
One
of the important initiatives out of the prostate PRG has been the
fact that we have now defined an NIH-wide prostate cancer research
plan that has been disseminated, that includes collaboration and
cooperative activities with other elements of the NIH, bringing
other institutes into a cooperative, collaborative process to foster
prostate cancer.
TOP |
| Slide
39: |
The PRG process has defined a very important strategic agenda
for prostate that has seven strategic areas for opportunities.
TOP
|
| Slide
40: |
|
And
the same process has occurred with regard to the kidney and bladder
PRG, giving us a road map, if you will, for future strategic resource
allocations and investments.
TOP |
| Slide
41: |
|
The
concept that I believe is most appropriate for us is to think of
this as a collaborative, cooperative effort that involves two levels
of integration. The first is the integration that must occur vertically.
And the NCI
bears the burden and the responsibility of providing the leadership,
and providing the opportunity to disseminate throughout the research
community, the opportunities to be able to enhance and affect the
discovery development delivery portfolio, but to do so in a way
in which there is vertical integration, so that this flows through
to the point where we really have impacted on the community and
patients who are at need.
In addition
to the vertical integration, there needs to be enhanced horizontal
integration, both within the NCI, and there is great effort underway
to do a number of trans-NCI initiatives that cut across the traditional
divisions. And we are also fostering that through many of our programs,
for example, an effort that is underway to enhance further collaboration
and integration among the cancer centers.
TOP |
| Slide
42: |
|
And
so it's a dynamic process, a process that I believe the urologic
community remains at the forefront of. And we continue the process
of fitting the pieces together in a way that helps us to further
enhance what we know, to define what we don't know. And more importantly,
to recognize that there is so much that we don't know, that we don't
know.
But working
together with GU tumors as an important example of leadership for
the future, I believe that we have extraordinary opportunity to
achieve and to recognize that hope for the future that Pres. Bush
committed this country to achieve. And I really can't tell you how
proud and honored I am to be a part of this community, and have
the opportunity to share with you our ability to work together to
achieve that dream.
Thank you.
TOP |
| |
|