








|
|
| SLIDES
& TRANSCRIPTS
Monday,
May 12, 2003
The
New Genetics of T-Cell ALL: A Fish Tale
A.
Thomas Look, M.D. |
| Slide
1: |
Thank
you, Bill. I would like to tell you about a new model of T cell
ALL in the zebra fish, and tell you why we think it may have use,
particularly for more of sort of translational genetics studies
related to molecular pathways in this disease.
TOP
|
| Slide
2: |
| So,
I would like to start with a little overview of work from Adolfo
Ferrando in my lab, that is published in the article shown on the
bottom of the slide.
We have divided
now T cell ALL into five different molecular pathogenetic groups.
Each of these pathways is a multi-step pathway, incompletely defined
at the present.
As you can see,
one prominent feature is activation of an intact oncogene, at least
one, and in some cases two, often as you know, by chromosomal translocation.
Richard Bayer
first, and then Adolfo, has shown that many of these genes can also
be activated by upstream mechanisms independent of chromosomal translocation.
As I said, the
main feature of these proteins, like HOX-11 or TAL-1/SCL are activated
as intact proteins. So, it is clearly their mis-expression in T
cell lineage lymphoblasts that contributes to transformation.
The last group,
you can see here, the MLL-ENL group, a rare subset of the MLL group
that you just heard about from Cheryl Willman, is clearly quite
different.
Of course, in
this case, you would have to have the chimeric fusion protein from
the 11q23 translocation. Here certain HOX genes -- Myc-1 and others
-- are activated, and not the genes in the predominant top four
groups.
So, you can
see a common feature of the first three groups is inactivation of
INC4a and ARF, often through homozygous deletion on 9p, and I will
call your attention to Myc.
So, you can
see, at least in the first three groups, it looks like Myc is very
central. It is upregulated in each of these groups.
In some cases,
there is a translocation into the Myc gene, together with other
mechanisms of activating, for example, TAL-1 and LMO2.
Myc-N seems
to be upregulated specifically in the LYL1 group, a BHLH protein
related to TAL1/SCL, and you can see in this case other tumor suppressors,
at yet undefined, seem to be involved.
So, let's focus
on Myc then. We decided if we wanted to model T cell ALL in man,
a good place to start would be a transgenic over-expressing Myc,
with the hope that we would then acquire other types of mutations
as the leukemia developed.
TOP |
| Slide
3: |
| So,
we chose the zebra fish as a model. I just want to briefly summarize
some of the advantages of this model.
A mating pair
can have very many offspring per week, which is an enormous advantage
for genetic and high throughput drug screen-type assays.
They are transparent,
as you will see in a minute, a nice feature for developing a transgenic
model. Transgenic technology is developed, they do certainly get
cancer.
The blood developmental
program is highly conserved. Much of this has come from work in
Lynn Zon's laboratory at Children's Hospital.
Finally, the
two main advantages, that I will come back to at the end of my talk,
the zebra fish system is amenable to forward genetic analysis, like
you have read about for years in Drosophila and C. elegans.
So, we think
that this feature in a vertebrate might be quite useful for defining
downstream molecular pathways.
Mark Fishman
and Stuart Schreiber have shown that these animals are amenable
to high throughput drug screens that can be arrayed out in plates,
and small molecules can be screened directly to identify active
compounds.
TOP |
| Slide
4: |
| So,
what about the model? As you see, this was recently published. So,
you are certainly welcome to go and look at this in detail. It sort
of put all the information in that paper in one slot.
So, what happens
is, with a fusion transgene, in which the mouse Myc gene is driven
from a zebra fish tag 2 gene promoter that we obtain from Shuo Lin
at UCLA, and there is a fusion with GFP, so that the tumor cells
will light up with GFP and fluoresce under a fluorescence microscope.
So, Shuo Lin
had already found this promoter as highly specific for T cells,
presumably, B cells also, although they are quite hard to identify
in the fish.
So, when one
injects this into a fish, David Langenau, a graduate student in
the lab, was able to obtain a stable transgenic line in which the
thymus is visible from five days of life, as two green dots on each
side of the fish. The thymus is very lateral in the zebra fish throughout
life. It doesn't merge in the midline.
You can see
that, by 22 days, T cell lymphoma is clearly developed, so that
there is spreading out enlargement of the thymus and spreading outside.
This progresses rapidly over the coming weeks.
By 60 to 120
days, the fish will succumb of massive leukemia involving enormous
spread throughout the fish, and the muscles around the head and
neck, and replacing the kidney marrow. The bone marrow is actually
in the kidney in the zebra fish.
TOP |
| Slide
5: |
| So,
this is published. I wanted to show you a couple of unpublished
findings that have us pretty excited.
I didn't show
you at the beginning, but the four pathways, or really five pathways,
are broken out in a pie diagram here.
So, you can
see that the most common type of T cell ALL is the group that activates
TAL-1/SCL along with either LMO1 or LMO2, often with INK4A deletions.
We haven't been
yet to define the molecular signature of the high risk patients,
but most of them reside in this group. So, this is a mixture of
better risk patients and the high risk group.
Obviously, this
is a group we would really like to model using our zebra fish model.
TOP |
| Slide
6: |
| So,
David Langenau took a look at a series of tumors that had arisen
in the fish, and you can imagine that we are quite delighted that
SCL TAL-1 and LMO2 seem to be activated in each of the clonal T
cell leukemias tested so far.
It looks like,
by over-expressing the myc gene, we know these leukemias are clonal,
with clonal rearrangements of the T cell receptor alpha locus, and
now we know that they mis-express both SCL and LMO2.
We don't know
if they actually have a chromosomal translocation, or if this aberrant
expression is mediated through upstream mechanisms. We certainly
think other mutations must be involved, since the leukemias are
clonal.
TOP |
| Slide
7: |
| This
shows the same thing by in situ hybridization with RNA probes, showing
the leukemia cells in the kidney -- these are the renal tubules,
instead of the bone marrow spicules -- showing, with the antisense
probe, high levels of expression of these cells compared to the
sense probe for both SCL and LMO2.
TOP |
| Slide
8: |
|
So,
what do we hope to do with this model? As I mentioned in the beginning,
one potential advantage of working in the zebra fish system is their
very small size and the reproducibility with which they develop
the leukemia.
So, what we
are trying to develop is a high throughput assay where you can put,
say, six to ten transgenic fish as, let's say, about two to three
weeks of age -- we are still working out the exact time -- at a
time when they are less than a quarter of an inch long, into wells,
array them out and then screen small molecules directly.
This has already
been done, as I said, by Mark Fishman and Stuart Schreiber to mimic
development defects that, of course, have been studied for years
in the zebra fish. So, this is the kind of thing we are looking
for, regression versus the usual progression.
TOP |
| Slide
9: |
| A
second advantage that I alluded to in my second slide is the idea
of modifier screens. So, for this, I would like to illustrate this
idea, rather than showing you a complex genetic screen diagram,
with a simple Kaplan-Mayer curve.
So, here you
see the fish, the transgenic fish with the Myc transgene, and this
is actually now, we are thinking not survival, but the onset of
T cell lymphoma.
So, let's say
this is two weeks to three weeks, in the unmodified fish. So, what
we can do is a genetic screen, mutagenizing the fish, and then observing
clutches of fish from mutagenized parents, looking for enhancer
mutations that will accelerate the onset of T cell leukemia.
So, the terminology
gets a little bit confused here. Actually, enhancer mutations, we
think would be either tumor suppressor genes or genes that increase
the overall rate of genetic instability.
So, that might
be nice, to discover a previously undiscovered tumor suppressor,
of which we know there are at least 10, based on LOH studies, that
remain to be found for T cell leukemia in man.
Then, of course,
the potentially even more interesting idea, which I think the zebra
fish is probably the only model that you could try to conduct such
screens, would be screens to look for suppressor mutations.
So, these would
be ones in which the fish did not develop leukemia nearly as rapidly
as in the wild type, but either didn't develop it at all or had
markedly delayed development.
These would
be, then, affected by suppressor mutations, inactivating genes and
proteins downstream of Myc somewhere, that would paradoxically prevent
the tumor from forming, but hopefully not affect the health of the
fish overall.
So, these, obviously,
would be potential proteins from which to try to develop drugs that
would inhibit them through small molecules, mirroring the effect
of the genetic mutations.
TOP |
| Slide
10: |
| So,
I will stop there, and just mention all the folks who contributed
this work. Primarily David Langenau somehow didn't even get on this
version of this slide, with help, as I said, from Adolfo Ferrando
and many others in my lab, Ed Prochownik, who is head of the myc
GFP fusion clone, Nickolaus Trede, Lynn Zon and David Traver in
Lynn Zon's lab has been enormously helpful throughout this project,
Shuo Lin, who sent us the rag2 promoter, our pathology colleagues
at Brigham and Women's who did all the hematopathology, and particularly
Max Loda, who helped out with the in situ hybridization that I showed
you. So, I will stop there, and I think we have time for questions.
TOP |
|